Published on September 9, 2025.
The combination of Claude and the NetSuite AI Connector is opening up exciting possibilities for financial analysis. Reports that once took hours—or even days—can now be generated in minutes. But faster doesn’t automatically mean better. To deliver results that executives, boards, and auditors can trust, we need to pair AI with solid process and controls.
In this post I share some practical best practices that I’ve developed, covering accuracy, governance, presentation, SuiteQL, advanced considerations, and organizational adoption maturity.
Before diving into specialized techniques, it’s important to lay a strong foundation. These general best practices will help ensure that your use of NetSuite AI is accurate, reliable, and secure.
AI tools can be persuasive and polished, but speed and polish are not substitutes for accuracy. Always validate critical outputs before sharing them. Spot-check revenue, margins, and totals against NetSuite’s system of record. These quick checks will give you—and your stakeholders—confidence in the results.
Enhancements to consider include:
• Establishing materiality thresholds so not every minor variance triggers escalation
• Applying cross-footing and tie-out procedures to ensure reports balance internally
• Performing period-over-period reasonableness checks for trends and anomalies
Example prompt: “Claude, using the revenue and net income for Q2, please recalculate the profit margin and confirm it matches the report.”
One of the most effective strategies is to use AI itself as a check-and-balance. Ask models to validate their own work, recompute key metrics, and surface assumptions. This creates a built-in review layer that mirrors how humans work in teams.
• Verify Key Ratios and Calculations
• Ask About Assumptions
• Confidence Scoring
Just as financial professionals often seek peer review, you can apply the same principle with AI. The idea is to use one AI model to review and validate the work of another. This introduces diversity of perspective and reduces the risk of a single model’s blind spots.
• Cross‑model validation: Ask a different provider’s model (e.g., GPT‑5 vs Claude) to review results for consistency.
• Version comparison: Run the same analysis with multiple versions of the same provider’s model to detect changes in behavior or reasoning.
• Independent review: Have the second model recompute totals, recalc ratios, and list assumptions, then compare outputs side by side.
Example prompt: “ChatGPT, please review the variance analysis that Claude generated. Confirm the calculations, and list any assumptions or limitations that Claude may have missed.”
AI analysis is only as secure as the environment it runs in. Without proper governance, sensitive financial or personal data can be exposed. Adopt strong security practices from the start.
• Use custom roles with least privilege so AI connectors only access necessary data.
• Log and monitor all AI Connector activity for audit trails.
• Begin with narrow data scopes and expand only when needed.
• Ensure operations run under user-level permissions, not Administrator roles.
• Define data retention policies for AI-generated reports.
• Encrypt data in transit and at rest.
• Apply special controls for M&A or confidential scenarios.
For AI to succeed in finance, teams must understand both the tools and the boundaries around their use. Managers play a crucial role in setting clear expectations and providing the right education.
Think of AI analysis as a conversation, not a one-and-done process. Start with broad prompts to get directional insights, then refine with deeper breakdowns, comparisons, or alternate perspectives. Expand this approach with prompt chaining—feeding the output of one analysis into the next for richer narratives. Establish feedback loops where users can rate or comment on outputs, and maintain a record of lessons learned from failures or near-misses to strengthen future prompts.
One of the subtle but powerful elements in AI-driven analysis is the use of a branding prompt. Just as you define validation rules and escalation procedures, you can also provide the AI with a consistent set of branding and formatting guidelines. This ensures every report—whether it’s a Flux Analysis, a Trend & Growth Analysis, or a Forecast—looks like it came from the same polished source.
By embedding these rules alongside the financial prompt, you create outputs that feel professional, executive-ready, and part of a cohesive reporting package. Examples include:
• Minimalist design with whitespace that makes content easy to read
• Simple typography and clear headings
• Monochrome visuals with electric blue highlights for emphasis
• Subtle, unobtrusive callouts for risks and assumptions
This visual consistency builds trust with executives and boards. It also reduces “format fatigue,” so readers can focus on the insights rather than adjusting to different layouts or styles with every report.
For a full example of a branding prompt, please see: NetSuite AI: Generate Flux Analysis Reports.
AI augments experts—it doesn’t replace them. Human oversight remains essential for credibility, compliance, and contextual judgment. Regularly involve financial professionals in both prompt design and review of AI outputs.
Consider involving:
• Accountants or Controllers
• Auditors
• Financial Analysts
• Industry Specialists
Enhancements to consider:
• Establish clear sign-off procedures for reports
• Document how professional skepticism was applied
• Require multiple reviewer sign-offs for high-impact reports
When leveraging SuiteQL with the AI Connector, it’s not just about retrieving data—it’s about structuring queries so Claude can deliver meaningful analysis. In my earlier post on SuiteQL, I outlined how self-documenting queries, aliases, inline comments, and built-in functions set the stage for better AI outputs.
Here are some highlights and additional guidance:
• Avoid currency conversion pitfalls by being explicit about exchange rates
• Handle intercompany eliminations carefully to avoid duplication
• Treat NULL values explicitly to prevent misinterpretation
• Keep queries at an optimal complexity—too simple yields thin insights, too complex can overwhelm the model
For more SuiteQL-related best practices, see: The NetSuite AI Connector: Instant Insights with SuiteQL
Even with disciplined processes, things can go wrong. Prepare for errors proactively and act quickly when signals appear.
• Recognize hallucinations or inconsistencies: Watch for outputs that contradict source data, shift when re-run, or include fabricated references.
• Escalation thresholds: Define quantitative triggers (e.g., variance > X%, missing tie-out) that require manual review.
• Fallback procedures for time-critical reports: Maintain manual workflows and cached templates for board packages and close.
• Circuit breakers: Automatically flag unusual patterns or outliers and pause distribution until reviewed.
Specific examples to act on:
• If a variance explanation doesn’t reference known business events (acquisitions, seasonality), escalate.
• If totals don’t cross-foot between related reports, halt and reconcile.
To truly establish an authoritative approach, consider these advanced strategies that go beyond the basics:
• Change Management & Model Updates: Test before adopting new model versions (e.g., Claude 3.5 → 4), document behavioral differences, and maintain backward-compatible prompts.
• Cost Management: Monitor API usage and token costs, optimize query efficiency, set budgets and alerts, and track ROI vs. traditional reporting.
• Data Freshness & Timing: Align AI runs with close timing, differentiate provisional vs. final numbers, schedule analyses to match data refresh cycles, and account for multi-timezone consolidations.
• Scenario Planning & Sensitivity Analysis: Use AI to generate multiple forecast scenarios, run sensitivity tests on key assumptions, document confidence intervals and assumption sensitivities, and stress-test models.
• Documentation Standards: Maintain documentation at three levels: prompt documentation (what we asked), process documentation (how we validated), and output documentation (what we delivered and to whom).
Small prompt changes can dramatically improve results. Here are a few quick before/after that you can adapt to your prompts:
❌ Poor: “Show me revenue.”
✅ Better: “Analyze Q2 2024 revenue by subsidiary, comparing to Q1 2024 and Q2 2023, highlighting variances > 10% with explanations.”
❌ Poor: “Show me expenses.”
✅ Better: “Break down Q2 2024 operating expenses by department, comparing to Q1 2024, and highlight any line items with growth >15%.”
❌ Poor: “Give me a variance analysis.”
✅ Better: “Prepare a variance analysis for gross margin by subsidiary for FY2024 vs FY2023, and explain any variances greater than $250k, noting likely causes such as pricing, volume, or cost changes.”
❌ Poor: “What’s our cash flow?”
✅ Better: “Generate a Q2 2024 cash flow summary by operating, investing, and financing activities. Highlight differences vs Q1 2024, and flag any negative cash flow drivers.”
❌ Poor: “Summarize sales.”
✅ Better: “Summarize Q3 2024 sales by product category and top 10 customers, comparing to the same quarter last year, and call out any categories with declines over 10%.”
Even with best practices in place, there are recurring mistakes that organizations make when adopting AI for financial analysis. Being aware of these pitfalls can help you avoid costly errors and improve trust in the outputs.
• Over-relying on AI without validation: Treating AI results as definitive without reconciling them against NetSuite reports or independent checks can lead to misstatements and loss of credibility.
• Using overly complex prompts: Long, multi-part prompts can confuse the model and produce inconsistent results. Break down complex requests into smaller steps or chained prompts instead.
• Not updating prompts when business rules change: If your accounting policies, fiscal calendars, or reporting structures shift, prompts need to be updated to reflect those changes. Otherwise, the AI will continue applying outdated logic.
• Forgetting fiscal-year vs. calendar-year differences: Misalignment between fiscal and calendar periods can create misleading trend or variance analyses. Always clarify which time basis should be used in prompts and queries.
Warning signs that your AI financial analysis may be going off track:
• Results that can’t be reconciled with source data
• Outputs that vary wildly when rerun with the same input
• Overly confident answers with no assumptions listed
• Reports that ignore obvious business context or recent events
• Significant changes in key metrics without explanation
• AI unable to explain its calculation methodology when asked
• Consistent rounding or calculation errors in specific areas
• Results that contradict known business constraints (e.g., negative inventory)
Organizations in regulated industries—or those handling sensitive data—must take extra precautions. Compliance frameworks, audit readiness, and data minimization should guide every use of AI in these contexts. Regulations are evolving; stay current with industry guidance (e.g., SOX for public companies, Basel III for banks, HIPAA/PCI/GDPR as applicable) and consult your legal and compliance teams regularly.
• Public Companies – Reconcile AI reports to the system of record, maintain documentation of queries and verification steps, and engage auditors early.
• Healthcare, Finance, and Other Regulated Industries – Comply with frameworks like HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR; mask or aggregate sensitive data; and log all AI interactions for traceability.
• Personal or Customer Data – Exclude unnecessary identifiers, enforce role-based access controls, and involve compliance teams in regular reviews.
Adopting AI for financial analysis isn’t a one‑time project—it’s a journey. The maturity model provides a framework to understand where your organization stands today and what best practices to adopt as you advance. Each stage comes with its own set of priorities and guardrails.
Crawl: Organizations at this stage are experimenting with 1–2 report types, often with fewer than 5 users. Best practice here is to keep validation manual and emphasize learning, documentation, and cautious exploration.
Walk: Teams are now using 5–10 report types with broader adoption. At this stage, best practices shift toward establishing automated checks, formalizing prompt libraries, documenting procedures, and training staff in AI literacy.
Run: Enterprise‑wide adoption with automated governance, advanced oversight, and measurable ROI. Best practices here include continuous monitoring, sophisticated error handling, tight integration with close processes, and tracking error rates below 2%.
By viewing adoption as a maturity curve, organizations can apply the right practices at the right time—balancing ambition with control as they scale.
The best way to use Claude and the NetSuite AI Connector is to balance speed with discipline. Follow these practices to ensure your reports are not only faster, but also accurate, transparent, and trusted.
• General: Trust but verify, with thresholds, cross-footing, and reasonableness checks.
• Professional & Regulatory: Involve experts, require sign-offs, document skepticism, and monitor evolving rules.
• SuiteQL: Write self-documenting queries, avoid pitfalls, handle NULLs, and refine continuously.
• Advanced: Plan for errors, model updates, cost control, data freshness, and scenario analysis.
Operational: Version prompts, maintain a prompt library, benchmark outputs, and scale responsibly.
By combining AI’s speed with disciplined financial practices, you’ll produce insights that executives, boards, and auditors can rely on—and you’ll position your organization at the forefront of responsible NetSuite AI adoption.
Hello, I'm Tim Dietrich. I develop custom software for businesses that are running on NetSuite, including mobile apps, Web portals, Web APIs, and more.
I'm the developer of several popular NetSuite open source solutions, including the SuiteQL Query Tool, SuiteAPI, and more.
I founded SuiteStep, a NetSuite development studio, to provide custom software and AI solutions - and continue pushing the boundaries of what's possible on the NetSuite platform.
Copyright © 2025 Tim Dietrich.