Sample output from the PE Value Creation Deck — QoE-Grade Self-Diligence prompt in the Sonar AI Prompt Library, run against a NetSuite test account. Every name and number here is test data. Back to the post · The library
SuiteStep, LLC
Value Creation Assessment · Prepared for Sponsor Review

$3.9M of identifiable enterprise-value upside, evidenced line-by-line from the live ledger.

A QoE-grade self-diligence of the FY2026 books — the earnings-quality findings a buyer's advisor would surface, found first, priced in EV terms, and paired with owned remediation levers. Every input figure queried live from NetSuite; nothing estimated.
Annualized EBITDA
$1.80M
FY26 YTD $1.197M × 12/8 · 14.3% margin
Baseline EV @ 8×
$14.4M
illustrative multiple · see sensitivity
Identified Upside
+$3.9M
+27.4% · three evidenced levers
SOURCE: live GL, account TD3016323 · posting-only · validated vs native Income Statement (zero variance)
BASIS: FY2026 YTD (Jan 1–Sep 1) · Q2 2026 quarter detail (periods 177–179) · all FY26 periods open — figures preliminary
PREPARED: 2026-09-01 · read-only analysis — no records modified
01

The value bridge: from today's EBITDA to the exit-ready number.

Three levers, each traced to specific transactions in this ledger. Levers 1 and 3 compound at the multiple; Lever 2 is cash at 1:1 and is deliberately not multiplied.

Enterprise Value Bridge · Center Case 8× (Illustrative) · $ Thousands
Baseline EV$1.80M EBITDA × 8
$14,366K
+ Margin recovery1.88 GM pts × 8
+$1,889KEBITDA +$236K/yr
+ Cash releaseworking capital, 1:1
+$1,148Knot multiplied
+ Multiple protectionQoE remediation
+$898K0.5× haircut avoided
Exit-ready EVcenter case
$18,300K
Bar geometry computed from the figures shown (shared scale; total = 100%). Multiple protection shown at the conservative 0.5× end of the 0.5–1.0× diligence-haircut range.
Conservative · 6×
$10.8M → $13.8M
+$3.0M upside
Center · 8×
$14.4M → $18.3M
+$3.9M upside (+27.4%)
Stretch · 10×
$18.0M → $22.4M
+$4.4M upside
Multiple is illustrative, not a valuation. 6–10× spans typical lower-middle-market ranges for this profile; the sponsor's own comps govern. Every EBITDA and cash input beneath the multiple is queried, not modeled. Working-capital release enters at 1:1 in all three cases.
02

Three levers. Named owners. Queried evidence.

Lever 1 — Recover the margin the ledger already proved possible

+$236K EBITDA → +$1.89M EV @8×
Timeline
100-Day
Owner
CFO + Ops
GM today (Q2)
39.66%
GM proven (Q1)
41.53%
Value per GM pt
≈$1.0M EV

Gross margin compressed 187bps in one quarter — while revenue grew 13.4%. The Q1 level is not aspirational; this ledger produced it two quarters ago. Action: transactional-book margin bridge (price/mix/cost) on the invoice-and-COGS pairs, then reprice or re-source the compressing lines. Each recovered point ≈ $126K annualized EBITDA ≈ $1.0M of EV at the center multiple.

EVIDENCE — 3-quarter P&L roll-up (TAL, periods 160–162 / 173–175 / 177–179): Q2'26 rev $3,306,152, COGS $1,994,999; Q1'26 rev $2,914,673, COGS $1,704,082. Annualization on FY26 YTD rev $8,388,817 × 12/8.

Lever 2 — Release the cash trapped in working capital

+$1.15M cash · 1:1
Timeline
Immediate
Owner
Controller / AR
DSO (honest basis)
135 days
DPO
8 days
90+ day A/R
$558,920

The company collects in 135 days and pays in 8 — financing everyone else's working capital. Three components: chase the $559K of 90+ receivables (named accounts, oldest due May 2025 — reserve what fails collection); bring DSO to 75 days on the organic book (releases ~$414K permanently at current run-rate); schedule vendor payments to due date (~$175K of permanent float against a 95%-current A/P base). Cash enters the bridge at 1:1 — deliberately unmultiplied.

EVIDENCE — open CustInvc aging (status 'A', foreignamountunpaid>0): $928,247 total, $558,920 in 90+; top debtors incl. Global Information $110,579 (due 2025-12-03), Mercury Co. $80,079 (due 2025-05-19). DSO release = (135.4−75) × $6,857/day organic. A/P: $180,934 open, 95% current.

Lever 3 — Remove the diligence haircut before diligence arrives

+$0.9–1.8M EV protected
Timeline
Structural
Owner
CFO + Audit
Rev via journals (Q2)
81.1%
A/R gap
$1.24M
A/P gap
$1.18M

The QoE finding a buyer's advisor bills six figures to discover: 81% of Q2 revenue arrives via six anonymous monthly "Beg Balance" journals, and both control accounts miss their subledgers by ~$1.2M — diagnosed to the dollar as the journal-posted share. Unremediated, this invites a 0.5–1.0× haircut (or an earnout structure) on an otherwise clean EBITDA. Remediation: document the journals' origin, reclass to dedicated summary-balance accounts or rebuild as subledger transactions, tie out at next close. This document's existence — findings surfaced and owned pre-process — is itself the mitigation narrative.

EVIDENCE — Q2 revenue by transaction.type: Journal $2,682,167 / 6 docs (JE 40473–75, 40497–99, memo "Beg Balance Entries", no creator recorded); CustInvc $600,377 / 108. GL AcctRec $2,163,312 vs subledger $928,247 (journal share $1,238,672). Haircut range = market convention, labeled as such — the only unqueried assumption in this document.
03

The cash conversion gap: 127 days of everyone else's float.

The single most fixable number in the file. Every day closed releases ~$6,857 of permanent cash at the current organic run-rate.

DPO 8d — vendors paid
DSO 135d — customers collect
127-DAY FUNDING GAP · CARRIED BY SUITESTEP'S BANK ACCOUNT

Target state: DPO ~30 (due-date scheduling, zero vendor risk — A/P is 95% current today) and DSO ~75 (collections program and credit holds). The gap shrinks 127 → 45 days; the difference is the $589K of permanent working capital in Lever 2's first two components.

04

Diligence readiness: what a buyer's QoE team finds, pre-answered.

Diligence testFinding (queried)Status
Revenue recognition basis81% of Q2 revenue via 6 monthly summary journals; organic book fully documentedFIX — L3
Subledger-to-GL tie-outA/R gap $1.24M, A/P gap $1.18M — both diagnosed to the dollar as journal-postedFIX — L3
Collectability / reserves60% of open A/R is 90+ days; no bad-debt reserve; oldest invoice 15 monthsFIX — L2
Organic growth quality+89.8% YoY invoiced revenue, +17% active customers, monotonic in-quarter — no loadingREADY
EBITDA reconciliationBridge ties to native Income Statement with zero variance; tax line $0 (confirm pass-through)READY
Operating leverageOpex flat (−1.2% YoY) against +29.5% revenue; op margin 11.2% → 17.0%READY
Backlog integrity57 open orders / $124K, all current-year, zero intercompany inflationREADY
Customer concentrationTop-10 = 75% of organic book; top-2 billers are also top-2 receivablesWATCH
Cash conversionQ2: $88K bank movement vs $562K operating income; Aug first negative month (−$46K)WATCH
Fixed-asset baseYTD D&A $6.5K on $8.4M revenue — asset-light or assets held outside these books; confirmWATCH

Scorecard verdict: 4 ready · 3 fix (all three are Lever 2/3 workstreams already scoped) · 3 watch. Nothing unexplained.

05

The equity story: what the sponsor actually owns.

"Underneath a fixable reporting wrapper sits an asset-light distribution business growing its invoiced book 90% year-over-year with flat costs, no leverage, and $2.6M of cash — and its three biggest value levers are all within management's control."
The journal regime is the wrapper, not the business. The transactional company underneath — 82 named customers, clean backlog, 73× interest coverage — is the durable asset. Every lever in this document is self-help: no market growth assumed, no synergies, no multiple expansion required to reach the exit-ready case.
+90%
Organic growth engine
Invoiced revenue YoY, customer base +17%, best month on record in Jun 2026
17.0%
Proven operating leverage
+6pts of op margin in 4 quarters with opex flat in dollars
$3.9M
Self-help EV upside
Margin recovery + cash release + QoE remediation, all evidenced, all owned
0
Unexplained findings
Every gap diagnosed to the dollar; every claim carries its query
Stated boundaries. All FY2026 periods were open at preparation — figures preliminary. Annualization is simple ×12/8 on YTD actuals. The blended P&L (including the journal layer) is the basis for EBITDA; the organic book is the basis for growth and DSO claims — each figure is labeled with its basis. The 0.5–1.0× haircut range in Lever 3 is market convention, not a queried figure. Income-tax line is $0 in the GL (pass-through assumed — confirm). This document prices operational levers; it is not a fairness opinion or a valuation.